You'll always be my favorite author on copyright for your important and groundbreaking scholarship on Monkey Selfies.
Yes, and I wish we had something similar. My oldest doesn't have any bad choices ahead, just different pros and cons. I have tried to respond to requests for help rather than dictating the process. It was nice to know I wasn't alone in taking that approach w/ the helicopter parents all around us.
We're going through the application process for the first time with our oldest, and he applied/ was accepted to the U where I work. I've tried to be as hands off as possible because I want him to be able to choose without him feeling pressure to come to Minnesota.
You denied yourself a great opportunity to put those two idiots in their place I did this once when I took lawyers fishing back when I was guiding. They were debating Chevron deference in an upcoming case, and after listening for a bit, I jumped right in. The look on their faces was precious.
Notably absent from this discussion is Brendan Carr, the senior GOP FCC commissioner. But I'm sure he'll jump right on the train to criticize Trump on this, maybe even as soon as he's done imagining how cool it would be to regulate internet content that he hates.
Exactly.
Here's a piece I wrote on equal time (also part of Section 315) scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcont...scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcont...
Its § 315 of the Communications Act of 1934. The Trump ad is gross, but Randall Terry, the Constitution Party candidate has also been using the rules to run a very graphic (anti-abortion) ad titled "Kamala Horror" But to answer your question: Yes. N word, profanity...campaign ads must run as is.
Can I be a silent investor in this business? It is sure to generate windfall profits, and I'd like to get in on the ground floor.