BLUE
EM
Elia Mascolo
@eliamascolo.bsky.social
PhD candidate at the Erill Lab. I love studying evolution through the lens of computational and theoretical biology. Math enthusiast and amateur jazz piano player.
53 followers99 following24 posts
Reposted by Elia Mascolo
Nnaturepoker.bsky.social

Reading through a thread on latest conda TOS issue Conda TOS changed last year, and they're blocking IPs from larger nonprofit organizations (such as universities) with more than 200 connections/downloads. Connections will remain blocked until targeted organizations pay up. 💻🧬🧪

2
EMeliamascolo.bsky.social

Two years ago we published about what we named "lytic deferment" in bacteriophages (doi.org/10.3389/fmic...doi.org/10.1016/j.mi... Food for thought. 🧬🦠🔬

Schematic diagram from (Casters et al., 2024) showing that phages' access to molecular resources is dependent on cells that can convert them into biomass through metabolism.
0
Reposted by Elia Mascolo
Sstcmicrobeblog.bsky.social

Hey flagellum, shift into reverse gear! by Christoph — In a classical manual gearbox, a gearwheel is inserted between the countershaft and the drive shaft. This reverses the direction of rotation of the drive shaft. Flagella have found a smart... Read more > tinyurl.com/mrpeyfe8#MicroSky#CryoEM

Scre­en­shot from animation demonstrating gearing in the Sal­monella flagellum. [Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38459206/]
0
EMeliamascolo.bsky.social

for their binding sites. Anyway, this is not a serious test. We'll need the code to go large-scale. It's just what I came up with given the limit of 10 jobs/day. After this limited experience with the webserver, I'm impressed! 🤯 END

1
EMeliamascolo.bsky.social

also the others we have at least one perfect solution in 6/8 cases. I also tried with totally random DNA. As I expected it binds DNA the normal way (helices in groove) even if there's no LexA binding site. Not necessarily a "wrong" prediction given how bacterial TFs "search" 8/

1
EMeliamascolo.bsky.social

Case 3 is particularly convincing because the site came out quite different from the consensus. It's not the classical CTGT-n8-ACAG, but AF3 predicts that the dimer binds there. AF3 can propose more than one model, but I was only looking at the first proposed. If I consider 7/

Sequence #3 is compared with the consensus of LexA and with the sequence logo.
Visualization of the LexA dimer and DNA as predicted by AF3.
1
EMeliamascolo.bsky.social

In 8/8 cases, the TF complex is perfect, and targets DNA using correctly the DNA binding domains. In 4/8 cases, the binding occurs precisely on my "randomized" LexA sites. Uppercase: from PWM; lowercase: random; underlined red: binding expected; highlighted yellow: bound. 6/

AF3 places the LexA dimer on top of the random LexA sites in 4 out of 8 cases. The 8 sequences are shown and the positions where binding is observed are marked.
1
EMeliamascolo.bsky.social

assembled correctly; (2) the LexA dimer contacts DNA with the known DNA binding domains in the DNA grooves; (3) it binds exactly on the "randomized" LexA sites (a pattern of 16 bp within the 40 bp). Here are the results on 8 sequences (we can't run >10 jobs/day at the moment) 5/

1
EMeliamascolo.bsky.social

at which the site starts is also random (Uniform) so that the sequence may not be in the center. I input the sequence of LexA, and set "Copies" to 2 because LexA acts as a dimer. I then try AF3 on the sequences I generated. I consider the test passed if: (1) the dimer is 4/

1
EM
Elia Mascolo
@eliamascolo.bsky.social
PhD candidate at the Erill Lab. I love studying evolution through the lens of computational and theoretical biology. Math enthusiast and amateur jazz piano player.
53 followers99 following24 posts